Indexed as the top pair of ZM — first seen block 53,788,798
Orgazm
0x192ebd106c780b5663164eeb3da44052d5e61e18
What the panels below say, in words, and an opinion on it
Holders by day, and what the supply was worth
What sits on the other side. A pool is a trading pair, not collateral.
| # | Address | Pool id | Hook | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZM | 0x44c4f…37cf1 | 0x1edbe7…2bde42↗ | 2.26e-7 ZM | $90.19 | $0.000020 | $37.3K | $20.4K | $34.36 | — | 0.100% dyn | 0x4e34…a544 | 53,788,798 |
A paired token with the dot is indexed: it links to its own page with holders and holders over time. The rest are known by address and pool only.
Prices, liquidity, volume and change per DexScreener as of 2026-10-01 16:30 UTC, refreshed hourly. A pool DexScreener has not picked up shows its on-chain tick price and liquidity L instead; fees are always read from the chain.
Wallets that sent or received ORGA that day · 48 days
Accounts holding a balance at each day’s end · 48 days · exact
Top 20 of 20 accounts with a balance, and how the supply is spread.
| Tier | Wallets | % Wallets | % Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whale$100K+ | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Shark$10K–100K | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dolphin$1K–10K | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Fish$100–1K | 3 | 16.67% | 84.30% |
| Crab$10–100 | 4 | 22.22% | 15.02% |
| Shrimpunder $10 | 11 | 61.11% | 0.69% |
| # | Account | Balance | Share | Transfers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0x8366a3…e40951Uniswap v4 pools | 946,675,880.1698 | 94.67% | 3,820 |
| 002 | 0x0d25e6…5b44ca | 24,821,546.5240 | 2.48% | 2 |
| 003 | 0x6d2117…d1400f | 10,129,460.2620 | 1.01% | 2 |
| 004 | 0x8b2afc…254ff7 | 10,000,000 | 1.00% | 1 |
| 005 | 0xecf44b…10d7e1 | 2,912,677.2325 | 0.29% | 3 |
| 006 | 0x92d435…72f765 | 2,710,131.3855 | 0.27% | 285 |
| 007 | 0x62788b…49a606 | 1,231,483.6955 | 0.12% | 1 |
| 008 | 0x6f0232…bc0f77 |
| 1,152,352.3808 |
| 0.12% |
| 2,664 |
| 009 | 0x458bbd…2c5beb | 274,894.2342 | 0.03% | 1 |
| 010 | 0x7856d2…2dd78d | 58,367.4847 | <0.01% | 3 |
| 011 | 0xd7c47f…6b95c5 | 24,328.7494 | <0.01% | 1 |
| 012 | 0x53901e…38c516 | 5,940.4272 | <0.01% | 1 |
| 013 | 0x111111…9d2f01 | 1,656.6404 | <0.01% | 1 |
| 014 | 0x447a09…60731d | 798.4206 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 015 | 0xc06ebb…ae264b | 264.5322 | 0.00% | 1 |
| 016 | 0xcd6b98…d09799 | 206.2725 | 0.00% | 1 |
| 017 | 0x48a097…46e13f | 11.5879 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 018 | 0x000000…00dead | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 1 |
| 019 | 0x8f10b4…13f996 | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 44 |
| 020 | 0x2ca37f…5d125f | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 2 |
ORGA daily close × supply that day · 15 days
What the data says
What it means
Wallets are leaving and the cap is falling with them. Nothing here argues for a floor; the holder count has to stop falling before the price is worth reading, and this page is the place to watch for that.
Concentration is rising as wallets leave, so it is the small holders going. That leaves a top-heavy book, fine until one of the large wallets decides to sell.
A mechanical read of this page over the last 30 days, not advice. The rules are fixed: holders against market cap, then concentration, activity and liquidity where they add something. Only the numbers move.
Share of wallet-held value in the 10 largest wallets · 48 days