Indexed as the top pair of IBRX — first seen block 51,551,647
Immunity Cat
0xa6b541ebe43de567b81dda55db9fc0cb0eadf201
What the panels below say, in words, and an opinion on it
Holders by day, and what the supply was worth
What sits on the other side. A pool is a trading pair, not collateral.
Wallets that sent or received IC that day · 50 days
| # | Address | Pool id | Hook | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | IBRX | 0x7c148…cd0cf | 0x4e5029…739b7c↗ | 5.60e-7 IBRX | $7.91 | $0.000004 | $11.6K | $4.4K | $4.01 | — | 0.00% | 0x778b…eacc | 51,551,647 |
A paired token with the dot is indexed: it links to its own page with holders and holders over time. The rest are known by address and pool only.
Prices, liquidity, volume and change per DexScreener as of 2026-09-13 09:29 UTC, refreshed hourly. A pool DexScreener has not picked up shows its on-chain tick price and liquidity L instead; fees are always read from the chain.
Accounts holding a balance at each day’s end · 50 days · exact
IC daily close × supply that day · 11 days
Top 8 of 8 accounts with a balance, and how the supply is spread.
| Tier | Wallets | % Wallets | % Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whale$100K+ | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Shark$10K–100K | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dolphin$1K–10K | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Fish$100–1K | 1 | 14.29% | 90.28% |
| Crab$10–100 | 1 | 14.29% | 8.88% |
| Shrimpunder $10 | 5 | 71.43% | 0.84% |
| # | Account | Balance | Share | Transfers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0x8366a3…e40951Uniswap v4 pools | 972,126,133.8143 | 97.21% | 564 |
| 002 | 0x4fe6c9…d90abe | 25,165,534.3125 | 2.52% | 2 |
| 003 | 0x370d15…0378b6 | 2,474,652.6118 | 0.25% | 1 |
| 004 | 0xcee384…49fef0 | 223,713.4040 | 0.02% | 1 |
| 005 | 0x7e7df6…261750 | 8,501.7524 | <0.01% | 2 |
| 006 | 0x7d0552…ab45c4 | 1,317.1601 | <0.01% | 2 |
| 007 | 0x134c66…97294a | 146.9446 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 008 | 0x778b0c…b0eacc |
| 0.0000 |
| 0.00% |
| 2 |
What the data says
What it means
Holders are slipping while the cap sits still: wallets are consolidating into fewer hands. Not alarming on its own, but there is less of a crowd underneath the price than there was, and crowds are what hold prices.
Concentration is steady but high: the ten largest wallets hold most of the value, so any one of them can move the price on its own.
A mechanical read of this page over the last 30 days, not advice. The rules are fixed: holders against market cap, then concentration, activity and liquidity where they add something. Only the numbers move.
Share of wallet-held value in the 10 largest wallets · 50 days