Indexed as the top pair of GE — first seen block 52,050,057
Doge
0xe29ac30d7acf2ef1c509f082179f2d35b8351e18
What the panels below say, in words, and an opinion on it
Holders by day, and what the supply was worth
What sits on the other side. A pool is a trading pair, not collateral.
Accounts holding a balance at each day’s end · 50 days · exact
Wallets that sent or received DO that day · 50 days
Top 42 of 42 accounts with a balance, and how the supply is spread.
| Tier | Wallets | % Wallets | % Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whale$100K+ | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Shark$10K–100K | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dolphin$1K–10K | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Fish$100–1K | 2 | 5.00% | 29.97% |
| Crab$10–100 | 24 | 60.00% | 68.64% |
| Shrimpunder $10 | 14 | 35.00% | 1.39% |
Share of wallet-held value in the 10 largest wallets · 50 days
| # | Account | Balance | Share | Transfers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 0x8366a3…e40951Uniswap v4 pools | 947,494,066.8826 | 94.75% | 4,997 |
| 002 | 0x218da6…60220a | 8,163,069.9384 | 0.82% | 1 |
| 003 | 0x1e8ae0…e52af0 | 7,573,865.6615 | 0.76% | 1 |
| 004 | 0x563848…869192 | 3,672,894.6947 | 0.37% | 2 |
| 005 | 0xabef5c…5019da | 3,575,943.0727 | 0.36% | 1 |
| 006 | 0xdcfb68…534fe2 | 2,938,479.3404 | 0.29% | 1 |
| 007 | 0x9cd718…532dc9 | 2,658,235.0311 | 0.27% | 1 |
| 008 | 0xfcaaae…262975 |
| 2,212,283.1121 |
| 0.22% |
| 1 |
| 009 | 0x3c86d5…4bab89 | 2,167,974.3699 | 0.22% | 2 |
| 010 | 0x4dd69b…49b0e0 | 2,004,379.9385 | 0.20% | 1 |
| 011 | 0x3397d0…c4db39 | 1,955,294.7345 | 0.20% | 1 |
| 012 | 0x2aa460…bcd7b6 | 1,919,095.9535 | 0.19% | 1 |
| 013 | 0xec230a…8ab4cd | 1,690,624.0981 | 0.17% | 1 |
| 014 | 0xd1836f…438cd3 | 1,247,931.3337 | 0.12% | 1 |
| 015 | 0xfb5ea9…8b91c3 | 1,170,434.6858 | 0.12% | 1 |
| 016 | 0x9adf17…8f2a26 | 1,099,590.2497 | 0.11% | 319 |
| 017 | 0xb74a7a…0caa0c | 1,099,409.3462 | 0.11% | 1 |
| 018 | 0x6f0232…bc0f77 | 811,222.2431 | 0.08% | 3,384 |
| 019 | 0xbb2101…0b5f27 | 760,476.8406 | 0.08% | 1 |
| 020 | 0xf70d7a…20dd5f | 729,174.5884 | 0.07% | 1 |
| 021 | 0x417c87…58a040 | 698,927.2996 | 0.07% | 1 |
| 022 | 0xa37c7d…9e71ec | 667,798.2233 | 0.07% | 1 |
| 023 | 0x547a10…74377c | 635,896.9885 | 0.06% | 1 |
| 024 | 0x7bca08…53709c | 633,609.2970 | 0.06% | 1 |
| 025 | 0xc7ea72…3b4e52 | 574,415.4644 | 0.06% | 1 |
| 026 | 0x8004ce…cdba9b | 572,168.3054 | 0.06% | 1 |
| 027 | 0x4883d4…3af57a | 543,307.6259 | 0.05% | 1 |
| 028 | 0xb29472…2c7eb6 | 425,397.6767 | 0.04% | 1 |
| 029 | 0x6af34e…3a022e | 124,039.6608 | 0.01% | 1 |
| 030 | 0x0963c9…f1031c | 106,020.9929 | 0.01% | 3 |
| 031 | 0xf8426b…aecf2c | 50,182.4925 | <0.01% | 2 |
| 032 | 0xc06ebb…ae264b | 23,080.1787 | <0.01% | 3 |
| 033 | 0x7e7df6…261750 | 624.3110 | 0.00% | 1 |
| 034 | 0xcd6b98…d09799 | 85.3516 | 0.00% | 1 |
| 035 | 0xc69cad…cc5605 | 0.0081 | 0.00% | 4 |
| 036 | 0xe38b36…512e8c | 0.0064 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 037 | 0x36b1c0…f4afc7 | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 038 | 0x57d649…bc0acc | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 039 | 0xc73a70…5746d4 | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 040 | 0x000000…00dead | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 1 |
| 041 | 0x2ca37f…5d125f | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 2 |
| 042 | 0x8f10b4…13f996 | 0.0000 | 0.00% | 14 |
| # | Address | Pool id | Hook | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | GE | 0x63b81…b373e | 0x9aceab…3e59bf↗ | 6.65e-8 GE | $302.89 | $0.000020 | $42.7K | $20.2K | $6.90 | — | 0.100% dyn | 0x4e34…a544 | 52,050,057 |
A paired token with the dot is indexed: it links to its own page with holders and holders over time. The rest are known by address and pool only.
Prices, liquidity, volume and change per DexScreener as of 2026-10-08 06:25 UTC, refreshed hourly. A pool DexScreener has not picked up shows its on-chain tick price and liquidity L instead; fees are always read from the chain.
What the data says
What it means
The cap is rising while wallets leave, so the gains sit with whoever stayed. That is thin participation: a few large holders set the price, and one of them selling is enough to turn it. Treat strength here with suspicion until the holder count turns up.
Concentration is falling as holders leave: the largest wallets are selling into a thinning crowd, which is the weakest combination on this page.
Activity is fading as well: a third fewer wallets a day are touching the token than a week ago, so whatever the holder count says, fewer people are acting on it.
A mechanical read of this page over the last 31 days, not advice. The rules are fixed: holders against market cap, then concentration, activity and liquidity where they add something. Only the numbers move.
DO daily close × supply that day · 17 days